Talk:Main Page
From MicroJustice
[edit] User Page
I would like to suggest that instead of a separate who-is-who, the user guide suggests contributors to make their own user-page. This is interesting to be able to assess the relevance of the contribution. In the long run it will also help to create reputation and reward elements. EH
[edit] Structure
This wiki needs more structure. We could think of the following pillars for the navigation:
- Positioning Microjustice. Development vision, mission, strategy; link to other services; positioning in the area of development.
- Product development. If possible framed as a process that delivers versions of products. Framing as a process is attractive. Concept>> Proof of concept.
- Products. Or versions that are more or less finalized.
- Projects. Project-management. Whether this should be on the wiki is a question that should be answered as well. This also depends on the type of organization. An organization of mainly voluntary contributions, open-source like, will need some open-source platform for work-packages that people can work on. If we have a more centralized organization, with an office that coordinates the sub-projects, it may not be necessary to have EdW MB
[edit] Communication with Contributors
In which way do we want to invite and communicate with contributors? More inviting to contributors could be titles such as: Help us to position Microjustice. Help us to develop products. Help us to define projects and work packages. EdW MB
- Patricia thinks the structure is way better now!
